YouTuber RobotoSan gets credit and thanks for making the request to Gretna PD and paying the fees to obtain these camera dumps.
The first link is from her 2024 arrest with some commentary, the second link is a her 2025 arrest with commentary, the third link is a link to a playlist containing unedited, uncommented footage from both 2024 and 2025 arrests.
Fourth piece of media is a screenshot of Candy’s post late last night decrying the release of the footage and labeling RobotoSan as a “smear campaign[er]”, “narcissistic abuser”, and a “sex trafficker”.
COMMENTS –
This goes to show how HUGE Candy really is. She’s a BLIMP! She’s THE most well-fed homeless person ever.
She’s also mouthy and uncooperative. That’s why she got a resisting and failure to ID charge tacked on.
Candy lied and said that in both arrests she was “swatted”. From all of the footage, it’s very clear that a SWAT team was never involved in the police response to her. There’s no armored vehicles like BearCats or Army MRAPs. There’s no tactical officers with sniper rifles or assault rifles ready to take her out.
I still maintain to this day that Candy doesn’t know what the definition of narcissism is and challenge Candy (like I’ve challenged Mr. Weider) to name the people we’ve supposedly trafficked or abused. I don’t know how publishing the video of Candy’s actual documented behavior is a “smear campaign”.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLG-svVX8dfFo
I saw this post from Candy. I can’t easily attach all of images here (go look for the post on her channel if you’re curious!) but giggled when I saw all these newsletters people are signing up Candy for.
It’s wrong on some level but I feel that it’s evened out by Candy being such a rotten person.
And yeah, this wasn’t the worst image in that post. There’s another one of a more .. sexual nature. It’s too weird and offputting for me to post lol.
Candy had a very bizarre nightmare involving a man who could alter their racial characteristics at will as he perped her with one foglight and no headlights.
I don’t really get the one headlight obsession with Candy. Apparently it’s a thing among a subset of TIs. Candy would make a GREAT traffic cop. She could write hundreds of tickets for burned out lights. (OK, she probably would be a terrible cop but you get the idea).
It reminds me of some of the early/mid 00’s GM trucks and SUVs that I would see on the road with only one DRL illuminated. That always stood out to me. Not as evidence of gangstalking but that that either GMs had a batch of faulty DRL lamps or it was some sort of weird GM marketing.
Just quoting part of the story, you can read the whole thing for what its worth (which isn’t much).
https://gangstalkedcreoleauthor.blogspot.com/2026/09/dream-manipulation-nightmare-09232026.html?m=1
NOPD responded for a welfare check on Candy Grandpre late on the night of 9/20.
Candy is lying and said that a SWAT team was sent after her, which is very obviously not the case. A single non-tactical NOPD officer responded to check on her welfare and left her alone after establishing she was OK.
I don’t know what preceded this. It seems quite probable to me that Candy’s repeated yelling, screaming, and cursing could have caused a member of the public to phone this in just as much as one of her online trolls might phoned it in as a form of harassment.
Candy more or less admits she scammed a $300 donation from a viewer to obtain the camera footage for her case. She never went through the process to obtain it and did not reimburse the man for the $300 after failing to obtain it.
She says she talked to some court clerk who was mean to her and told her to fuck off (more or less) and didn’t so much as try talking to a lawyer, the police department, or even the DA. Hell, a 5 second Google search would have told her how to get it.
Also, I’m a little rusty on my knowledge of the law, but my layperson’s understanding of the law is that during pre-trial hearings, both sides would have to discuss openly in court what evidence they plan to bring. I’m certain the body camera footage would be something the prosecution planned to present during a trial because, well, it pretty conclusively establishes that Candy is dead to rights guilty. The prosecution would then be obligated to provide this to the defense free of charge.
Also this ignores the 5000lb elephant in the room which is the fact that she fired her public defender. The PD would have handled this for her and gone through the correct channels for it.
Candy says she didn’t return the money because the man blocked him after failing to obtain the footage. I don’t know if I really believe this, but an honest person would have gone out of their way to return that money. If she was blocked before she could return it, she could have made a video or post saying she would like to return the money as a gesture of good will.