What Is Gangstalking? What are TIs?

Many of you may already be familiar with this video but I thought this was such a good introduction to the topic that it deserved to be prominetely displayed on the site for new comers.


9 thoughts on “What Is Gangstalking? What are TIs?”

  1. Yes, TI’s like the “ufo-ologists” are completely full of batshit but the D.O.D. admitted in 1997 to creating-in large part- the UFO disinformation subculture to cover their recon flights and experimental aircraft.

    The deliberately stupid “TI”s are the same thing for covering JTTF and organized crime disruption operations. Derrick Robinson, John Hall , Dr. Weisenberg, Dr. Robert Patrick Duncan, except the ones caught in a drug crime and forced into a provocation role, all believe they are doing their patriotic duty.

    Much of the details of these operations have already been covered by the ACLU, the British press and many court cases going through the district courts. Either you are a civilian who has no absolutely clue what’s going on in federal law enforcement..or you’re a not-so-clever disinformation troll.


    1. You’re throwing accusations at me about a subject that I’ve never covered in this blog. Get out of here with your bullshit.

  2. I’m going to go with not-so-clever since you’re targeting one guy for a hate campaign. If you were serious, then you’d target the entire subculture and ,if this guy is a worthwhile subject, why doesn’t he know anything about the legal system in the US? I’m just sayin…

    1. I’ve attempted to cover multiple individuals on this blog but quite frankly Bryan Tew is what brings in the most hits and comments. Shrugs. You can see that for yourself in my posting history.

  3. You wouldn’t waste your time putting together a video like this unless you are a perpetrator of this sadistic, horrific human rights crime that you are trying to convince people doesn’t exist. Go to http://www.humanexperimentsgonewild.com to really understand — full of doctors’ insights and the highly educated and life-experienced humanitarians who want the crime cartel to stop. By the way, moron, you mis-spelled shielding.

    1. Lynn,

      I am not the creator of the video. I just liked the video enough to prominently feature it on this blog. Also, I did not mention shielding in this blog post or comments so I have no clue what you are referring to.

      The evidence of “mind control” or “targeting” is severely lacking. When taken all together, all of the claims look like schizophrenia and mass delusions. Mind/body control delusions have been documented long prior to the advent of modern technology. People have heard voices in their head since forever – you can find ancient accounts of people who claimed to hear God speak to them.

      As for the website you linked, I don’t see a lot of compelling evidence on it. You should realize that Robert Duncan is probably lying about his credentials (in my opinion). Duncan does not have a PhD dissertation on file with the universities he claims to have received doctorates from (checked online) and has never provided evidence that he has obtained the degrees he is claimed to have received.

  4. Stefan,

    First of all, I would like to emphasize that I do not support the “Electronic Harassment Community” or the targeted individuals in any way. However, there is a more conventional truth that you are missing in your responses to Lynn. I fear that Lynn has missed it even more than you.

    Robert P. Duncan, is a self appointed expert in the “Electronic harassment community” and has a computer science degree from Dartmouth and a masters degree over at Harvard- but he’s as big a bullshit conspiracy author -as you are uninformed about this issue. If you check there you will find it.

    He’s frequently cited by Dr. John Hall and Dr. Leibowitz and other credentialed “TI’s” as “proof” of satellite weapon targeting. In fact, it’s a huge canard to make sure police harassment & federal disruption victims get discredited-thereby shielding the local police from law suits-for basically doing their job. I know this because I’ve prepared such a law suit.

    However, they don’t always succeed. Some people fight back.

    In fact, more and more of us are successfully using lawyers and suing cops and confidential informants who engage in Federal disruption and watch list harassment.

    I don’t support the “TI community” and people who identify as TI’s because they have fallen into a honeypot cover for law enforcement disruption and watch-listing in the United States. They end up getting mixed up by the tinfoil hats, repeat these TI stories from the internet to a doctor and it’s straight to the psych ward for them-which is the point.

    By the way, yes there are a few non-lethal weapons that are used on people illegally such as mace, LRAD’s and certain restricted pesticides . It’s not hard to get a drug addict or a CI(as if there were a difference?) to do this for you.

    The ACLU and theintercept.com have lots of information on this. Why don’t you try getting some actual facts before you comment?


    1. Sam,

      Why are you moving the goalposts on Duncan? The issue was always the reference to Duncan as a “Dr.”, degrees of which do not exist as far as I can tell. Maybe he really does have a Masters (which is generally a pre-req to get a PhD), but that was never something I tried to dispute. Calling him “Dr” makes him sound credible which he doesn’t deserve as far as I can tell. That’s all I ever said about him. So get off my dick.

      I am glad you agree with me that TIs are full of shit. That’s the whole fucking point of this blog. This blog was never about questionable investigative tactics, overpolicing, police brutality, 4A violations, or anything else like that.

      On other websites I champion the 4A, reforms to SOP of policing tactics (because I’m fucking tired of hearing about people getting shot by cops for no reason), surveillance reforms (in light of Snowden’s revelations), and restraining the use of things like “Stingrays”, automated license plate data collection, facial recognition technology, and many other civil liberties issues.

      But on this blog we talk about TIs, the lunatics who are part of that community, and the ridiculous things they claim are happening. NOTHING ELSE.

      Yes, crowd-dispersion sound weapons exist. Pepper spray exists. So the fuck what? It doesn’t justify TI claims and you obviously know that. So why the fuck are you bothering me about it? It seems like you just want to argue for the sake of argument, not because you actually have a valid counterpoint to anything I’ve said.

  5. Gosh Stefan, you seem upset. I hope you’re not “very offended” that ,in my mind, a blog entirely devoted to making one possibly mentally ill person -look stupid-is not really funny and of questionable ethics.

    It sort of reminds me of the series “Bumfights”. Anyway, I don’t want to engage in specious arguments about the intent of your website. I’m painting a much bigger picture here.

    You could make yourself useful ,and certainly more interesting, if you concentrated your efforts on exposing Dr. Robert Patrick Duncan, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Lebowitz and Dr. Katherine Horton ,Dr. Matthew Aaron and all the people who lend their credentials to manufacturing disinformation on the internet and mass media for law enforcement and other agencies.

    Even if you don’t recognize the power of disinformation and “fake news”– if you just bad mouth these leaders of the so-called “electronic harassment community” then you’ll be doing the American people a real service. It would certainly be more interesting than what you’re doing now. It would also take some guts.

    About the ridiculous claims, not every claim is stupid-even though the stupid claims are the only ones promoted by websites such as FFCHS , PACT, IAACT and the disinformation doctors. At their base the claims are, #1.) random people are provoking them and #2.) they get attacked by non-lethal weapons in apartment settings.

    Now why would this be so outside the realm of possibility? There are literally millions of police and federal CI’s in the United States and their other name is “Provocateur” or as they call it in the Bureau a “Provocation Agent”. Why is it such a stretch of the imagination that provocation agents aren’t being used like they were in the Hoover era? The answer to that question is in the Intercept article I posted before and -of course they are-and not just on terror suspects.

    21st century policing has eclipsed what was possible under Hoover and COINTELPRO is back. Why wouldn’t it be? We’re in the Global War on Terror aren’t we? How do you think such wars are fought if you can’t open torture centers and build gulags? Exactly how the FBI did it in the late 50’s and early 60’s by surveillance, harassment and disruption and false imprisonment. False imprisonment in America includes psychiatric wards:

    To be fair, she was just a political target for tarnishing the reputation of the police chief and local billionaire. However, psychiatric holds are frequently used on political problems all over his country. I’ve been such a target too in the past-so I know firsthand about the unholy alliance between cops, politicians and big money. I know all about it.

    As for nonlethal weapons, you don’t need anything exotic. The victim has to be isolatable in an apartment. They just take a can of old style pesticide and contaminate the apartment from below or along the floorboards, sporadically use an audio spotlight. That guy won’t get any sleep for days, are incoherent after 48 hours of it- and if they go to an emergency room—boom straight to the psych ward.

    Often the local cops are there in the emergency room to make sure you go straight to the nuthouse instead of getting treatment.

    If you’re really tough or flee to hotels then send a provocation agent/CI to start a fight and you’ve got the guy off the street. Spray a little mace under the motel door too. Simple.

    This is what the TI community is talking about-however incoherently. I really hope you’ll have a change of heart somewhere down the line instead of engaging in a bunch of specious arguments about what your website is for.

    You could do a lot of good if you approached the issue with an open mind, facts and logic. A lot of people are getting their lives destroyed and sometimes killed-and this website is just contributing to the problem of systematic police misconduct.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.